PS To all everything should be clear (the largest part of the locals it is also known), and me at t

[..] D stand has enjoyed the same system or have seen how it goes with acquaintances. I can not understand how it could have been and how the interests of the Navy (JS) for all senior officers with experience took away or not give tolerances. For example, Andrew Star - the first rank of captain, in addition to JS ended two educational institutions in the US, and many thought of the young and perspective Latvian Commander JS candidate, but nothing. Ilmars Lešinskis, now dead, but the list could go on. Common is that they have been studying in the USSR times in various military training institutions and many wives is not Latvian.
When you view only one - protection - area. Is it unites the community, if the Latvian Defense Forces and the NBS accounted for many officers who studied and served in the Soviet time, and then they had to leave? Everyone mall virtual can think and assess whether it is in the interests of Latvian. [..]
copper drums: About tolerances (special permission to access) VNO issuing / subtraction incomprehensible criteria VB wrote already (here, here, here, here). I can agree, General, that in this area the problem is more than sense.
First of all, being able to guess the "game" rules many officers choose to please superiors because VNO tolerances candidates are not known clear criteria as to what is disqualifying. It will be one of the USSR Military School acquired military education, another of the same "defect" HP continues to lead. One wife of a Russian family with RU (oh the horror), another just recently "come out of the closet" and continues to work. Seat system sacrifices a few minutes, I can readily be called at least as much that were not barely worse than those who remained in the service. mall virtual They say that the authorities are unable to catch any real spy, this is not true, over the years has cleaned hundreds of potential. Applause!
Secondly, bezjēgā is produced VN objects work which should be tolerance. If the NBS will hold a training battle with honestly mall virtual do their best to comply with all ordinances and instructions that regulate this area, no LV tank neizkustēsies from the site because the commander will not be able to pass the command to a subordinate who has not had time to settle tolerance via he has a lower level of tolerance. If all the honoring of emergency procedures may be forgotten, neglected, the day after winning the curators to come and ...
Third, to ensure that the tolerance VNO refusal legality and proportionality, based on official mall virtual secrets mall virtual Section 9, paragraph 6 of Part Three, do not disclose the "customer" of all operational information scene, mall virtual it would suffice if authorized and independent mall virtual commission from time to time review the anonymised decisions and report to the Parliament on number of cases where tolerance denied unreasonably. For actually broken careers and lives to pay at least "a chair".
Fourth, the law contained in the words "for which, on checking, there are facts which give rise to doubt its credibility and ability to keep state secrets" it's time to reconsider. So that it can be established legal waster.
PS To all everything should be clear (the largest part of the locals it is also known), and me at the time, "sašūpota" tolerance (the reasons can not imagine), but after the appeal, SABAM was restored. There is still justice on earth.
1) of the ECHR is not an EU court 2) If he talks about Ternovska case, then there categorically NOT a story about tolerance, but about the right to be heard in court proceedings. Especially if we take into account 44 above, 'the Court emphasises That what is at stake for the Applicant in the present case is not a right of access to State secrets, Which is, as Such, not guaranteed by the Convention. "
About some aspect of a legal arrangement exactly are you talking about? mall virtual Yes, the whole world recognized that tolerance VNO has special rights and state is free to decide who to give / withhold. What our politikāņi also used by creating a system that, where necessary, even Džizez Kraist not pass inspection. Very comfortable. And this is not about Brok, Dreimanis, or some other yet, it is created on the system adequacy and control of its operation.
I am a direct and concrete contribution of the ECtHR case that many like to refer to the post. Really I do not perceive that the top of the ST clearer mall virtual judgment, this plot has the right to procedural due only - tb from other ECHR judgments (if finally immiscible) already apparent that in general can not give the right to appeal, but if you prefer, they must be procedural soundness.
In principle there is no difference between mall virtual military and civilian gardens. It is an effective weapon in the hands of a government official, as he uses no one knows. One part of the people believe mall virtual that honest and good, the other part of that evil and unprofitable, tertiary part do not care, as long as it does not touch the same. And here is the story of Dreimanis (something God would give her strength and health), but about our country's future. We obviously want to authoritarianism and corruption in the country into the abyss, where legal instruments, mall virtual in criminal aim will be achieved