praag.co.za current, active, african! Regular image of South African news and international events

praag.co.za current, active, african! Regular image of South African news and international events in Join News Southern Africa International news African news Business Columnists Albert Brenner Andre Alkema Anton Barnard Buks van Rensburg Christo Landman Dan Roodt Danie Goosen Dirk Uys Gerhard Lourens Gideon Meiring Götterdämmerung Gustav Venter Hannes Engelbrecht Hein Zaayman Heinrich Matthee Appel Piet Kotze Pieter Oosthuizen appleton mall Columnist appleton mall hit parade Skoppensboer Socrates the Act Sonette appleton mall Ahlers Susan Combrink Sydney Gregan Thys Human Vlad du Plessis Opinion Editorials Letters Cartoons Living Home & children Shopping Food and Wine Fashion & Beauty Cars Car News Motorsport Essays Essays Petitions Podcast The mountains mourn Travel Business Travel Getaway appleton mall Sports Rugby Football Golf Tennis Swimming Athletics appleton mall Technology Private Space Business Technology serial General Poetry History appleton mall Join now! Shop
The law firm Webber Wentzel's case against Steve Hofmeyr and Dan Roodt at the Equality represents a serious violation of freedom of speech. They are of "hate speech" charges because they express themselves against violent crime and writing on the Internet. I insist that Webber Wentzel abandon their lawsuit that merely seeks to Hofmeyr and Roodt silenced and hereby expresses appleton mall my support in favor of freedom of speech for all African appleton mall activists. [Signature]
Nothing could me more amazed than I on November 13 the press release by AfriForum with the title, "Dan Roodt's statements set Africans in bad light" reading. My first reaction on Twitter was:
What resulted? wonders. I have heard that there are meetings at AfriForum about everything before a decision is taken. It therefore an hours-long meeting took place during Kallie Kriel, Ernst Roets, and a few others deciding what before they make a statement against my issue? Perhaps it was a great "strategic" appleton mall decision?
Was possible AfriForum concerned about all the criticism that they have to endure from Liberal ranks, namely that "the right and racist". Then Kallie Kriel in the meeting and said: "You know, guys, I have a plan. We need to show our liberal might as politically correct as they occur. Let's give them a new target: We pushed for Dan Roodt that he endured the beatings. "
In Amasonevallei as a farmer and his cattle, wine by to lead a tributary of the river it crawling with piranas, then kill him a cow as bait for the horrible roofvissies. While the carcass within an hour or two strip us, then he does his flock peacefully higher up the river wading.
From the moment that I and Prague decided to give Steve a stone out of the way to roll by the court against Conrad Koch aka Chester Missing to ask, suddenly a horde of critics pounced on me. Suddenly those dishonest edited appleton mall dud of a video which raised the Daily Show me literally words in the mouth of the wrong answers to questions which I answered quite differently, insert.
Now I wonder: Is this the kind of "smart" tactics that you approve at AfriForum? So can I just bring my video camera and an interview with Ernst Roets come out and after the interview to edit as I want? Would you consent to such an interview in the Daily Show-style?
The fact is that I was misled by the Daily Show to think that it would be a serious interview during which I to foreign viewers would transfer the problems in South Africa, about crime, murders, and linguistic and racial discrimination against whites.
What is the Daily Show's tactics? I have since discovered that comments on Bloomberg anyone appleton mall advise against taking part in the Daily Show, because they are so dishonest and edit or manipulate video. The problem is that this article on Bloomberg first year was published on 23 September 2014 while the malicious Daily Show interview with me recorded in 2010 and was broadcast. If I have the Bloomberg article then read, I probably would never have granted the interview.
Now Kallie, Ernst and the rest of the Afriforumspan probably argue that Bloomberg's opinion is not worth much. I would like to ask: Consider your Bloomberg as a far, "racist" source of information? Nevertheless, it is clear that this columnist of the Daily Show Bloomberg is not considered a serious news source considered, and feels that they perform dishonest and unfair with their techniques of interviewing and editing. Therefore one should "your camera and a witness to bring together" to make sure that they are not what you say, pervert. appleton mall In fact, s